«

»

Jun 28

Learning Theory as Instructional Technology – or “the Animal Method of Learning”

Just got a paper accepted for a collection (edited by Neil Selwyn & Kari Facer) on The Politics of Education & Technology forthcoming from Palgrave. The focus of my contribution is on the technological, instrumentalist character of learning theories that are generally central to the way that the value of educational technology is conceptualized. Here’s the first paragraph:

Even the most rudimentary definitions of the term ‘technology’ indicate that its meaning extends far beyond artefacts and devices to include processes, methods, means and applied knowledge. It is therefore surprising how rarely instructional theories, methods and applications –e.g., learning theories learning designs or learning environments — are considered specifically as technologies in the relevant literature. This chapter focuses on the instrumental nature of the concept ‘learning’ and learning theory, which Gert Biesta and others have characterized as being manifest in a ‘new language of learning.’ This refers to a vocabulary or discourse that, for example, characterizes ‘‘teaching’ [as the] ‘facilitation of learning’ [and], ‘education’ [as the] ‘provision of learning opportunities’’ (Haugsbak & Nordkvelle, 2007, p. 2). The paper argues that this vocabulary represents a particular technologization or instrumentalization of education, a process that makes educational practices and priorities appear germane to, or even incomplete without, technological rationalization and reshaping. This paper traces how this vocabulary casts learning as a natural and universal process, and quite consistently accompanies the promotion of a range of technological artifacts in education. Running from the introduction of ‘teaching machines’ through to current visions of school reform, this theoretical lexicon will be shown to efface its cultural and ideological contingency through a quasi-scientific ‘neutrality’ and a biologically-based universality, and to limit the possibility for educational discourse and practice.

Download a draft version of this paper.